Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack
The Austrian Attack, 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4, is one of the most ambitious systems against the Pirc Defense. Read the guide
Play any move on the board to explore from there, or step through the line with ‹ › and the arrow keys.
Statistics from Lichess
1,894,131 games: White 51.0% / Draw 4.9% / Black 44.0%
| Next move | Games | White / Draw / BlackW / D / B |
|---|---|---|
| 1,772,8461.8M | ||
| 31,91032K | ||
| 23,19923K | ||
| 16,99917K | ||
| 15,19615K | ||
| 8,0788,078 | ||
| 7,7177,717 | ||
| 7,2677,267 |
Rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 to 2500, from the Lichess opening explorer, updated Oct 31, 2026
Engine evaluation
+0.48 White is slightly better
Best play: 4... Bg7 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Bd3 Nc6 7. O-O e5 8. d5 Nd4 9. f5
Stockfish 19, depth 30, after the line's last move. Scores are in pawns, from White's side.
By rating
Rating changes little here: White scores 54% under 1400, 55% at 2200 and up and 56% in master games (wins plus half the draws).
| Players | Games | White / Draw / BlackW / D / B |
|---|---|---|
| Under 1400 | 154K | |
| 1400–1799 | 590K | |
| 1800–2199 | 1.2M | |
| 2200 and up | 321K | |
| Masters, over the board | 5,043 |
Master games
- Karjakin, S. – Ivanchuk, V.
- Polgar, J. – Carlsen, M.
- Karjakin, S. – Ivanchuk, V.
- Mamedov, R. – Carlsen, M.
- Karjakin, S. – Ivanchuk, V.
Rated blitz, rapid and classical Lichess games by rating band, and over-the-board games of players rated 2200+ from the Lichess masters database, updated Sep 27, 2026
Description
The Austrian Attack, 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.f4, is one of the most ambitious systems against the Pirc Defense. White sets up a broad pawn centre early in the game and uses the advanced f-pawn to support the breakthrough e4–e5.
Origins
Siegbert Tarrasch used the Austrian Attack to beat Rudolf Charousek in 17 moves in 1896, while Edward Lasker lost with it to Miguel Najdorf. In the 17th game of the 1972 World Championship, Bobby Fischer answered Boris Spassky's 1.e4 with the Pirc Defense, the only time in his career, and Spassky chose the Austrian Attack; the game was drawn. The line is well respected by Nick de Firmian, the author of Modern Chess Openings, and Jan Timman has played it successfully with both colours.
The idea
The Austrian Attack aims to take advantage of Black's hypermodern approach. Black often castles early and looks for counterplay with ...c5, in some cases ...e5, or by developing the queen's knight.
Main lines
After the usual 4...Bg7 5.Nf3 the main moves are 5...O-O and 5...c5.
- After 5...O-O, the most frequently played move is 6.Bd3, the Weiss Variation. 6...Nc6 is the most common reply; 6...Na6, with the idea of ...Nc7, ...Rb8 and ...b5, became popular in the 1980s after 6...Nc6 was found to offer Black few winning chances.
- 6.e5 (Unzicker Attack in this database) is a sharp try with unclear consequences. It was much played in the 1960s but has never become popular at the highest levels.
- 6.Be3 (Kurajica Variation) was first explored extensively in the 1970s and was played by Bojan Kurajica, Yuri Balashov and Alexander Beliavsky; it leads to sharp play.
- 5...c5 (Dragon Formation in this database) strikes at White's centre at once. The usual replies are 6.dxc5, which allows 6...Qa5, and 6.Bb5+, which leads to tactics: a common line is 6...Bd7 7.e5 Ng4 8.e6 fxe6, a move thought bad until Yasser Seirawan played it against Gyula Sax in 1988. The sharp 6.e5 Nfd7 7.exd6 O-O is considered to give Black good play.
- Instead of 5.Nf3, White can attack at once with 5.e5 Nfd7 or develop with 5.Bd3; 5.Bc4 is the Ljubojevic Variation.
Strengths and weaknesses
For White
- A broad pawn centre and the e4–e5 break, supported by the f-pawn.
- A direct, aggressive line that tests Black's hypermodern set-up.
For Black
- Early castling and counterplay against the centre with ...c5 or ...e5.
- Lines such as 5...c5 6.e5 Nfd7 7.exd6 O-O give Black good play.
Who should play it
The Austrian Attack suits White players who want to meet the Pirc head-on, with a big centre and attacking chances.
The numbers
In 1,894,131 rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 and 2500, White won 51.0%, Black 44.0%, and 4.9% were drawn. White is ahead in every rating band: 52.3% against 44.3% under 1400, 52.2% against 44.1% at 1400–1799, 50.6% against 44.6% at 1800–2199 and 51.5% against 41.7% from 2200 up. In about 5,000 master games White won 37.0%, Black 24.8%, and 38.2% were drawn.
Suggest an improvement or report a mistake
Popularity by year
The Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack has stayed between 0.067% and 0.086% of Lichess games a year since 2016 (0.077% in 2025).
Numbers by year
| Year | Share of games | Games |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.069% | 24,573 |
| 2017 | 0.085% | 46,837 |
| 2018 | 0.086% | 67,377 |
| 2019 | 0.081% | 101,168 |
| 2020 | 0.076% | 222,690 |
| 2021 | 0.067% | 262,934 |
| 2022 | 0.069% | 259,361 |
| 2023 | 0.068% | 256,451 |
| 2024 | 0.073% | 262,714 |
| 2025 | 0.077% | 267,766 |
| 2026 (Jan–Apr) | 0.081% | 89,096 |
Share of rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 to 2500 (blitz, rapid and classical) that reach this position, by year; 2026: January to April. Which openings are rising and falling
Variations (3)
Sources
- History and theory: adapted from the Wikipedia article Pirc Defence, version of 21 October 2026, under CC BY-SA 4.0.
- Results: Lichess opening explorer, figures collected from September to November 2026.
Cite this page
Caissa Codex. “Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09)”. Lichess data as of 31 Oct 2026. https://chesscodex.org/openings/pirc-defense-austrian-attack