Horwitz Defense
The Horwitz Defense (1.d4 e6), also called the Franco-Indian Defence, is a flexible reply to 1.d4. Read the guide
Play any move on the board to explore from there, or step through the line with ‹ › and the arrow keys.
Statistics from Lichess
62,943,597 games: White 51.0% / Draw 4.8% / Black 44.2%
| Next move | Games | White / Draw / BlackW / D / B |
|---|---|---|
| 25,468,29525.5M | ||
| 10,945,59210.9M | ||
| 9,678,2489.7M | ||
| French Defense: Normal Variation | 7,619,8867.6M | |
| 4,109,9504.1M | ||
| 2,339,7862.3M | ||
| 753,575754K | ||
| 522,512523K |
Rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 to 2500, from the Lichess opening explorer, updated Nov 5, 2026
Engine evaluation
+0.31 White is slightly better
Best play: 2. e4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. f4 c5 6. Nf3 Nc6
Stockfish 19, depth 30, after the line's last move. Scores are in pawns, from White's side.
By rating
Rating changes little here: Black scores 47% under 1400, 46% at 2200 and up and 45% in master games (wins plus half the draws).
| Players | Games | White / Draw / BlackW / D / B |
|---|---|---|
| Under 1400 | 27.8M | |
| 1400–1799 | 48M | |
| 1800–2199 | 33.3M | |
| 2200 and up | 3.7M | |
| Masters, over the board | 42K |
Master games
- Carlsen, M. – Caruana, F.
- Ding Liren – Carlsen, M.
- Giri, A. – Carlsen, M.
- Aronian, L. – Carlsen, M.
- Aronian, L. – Carlsen, M.
Rated blitz, rapid and classical Lichess games by rating band, and over-the-board games of players rated 2200+ from the Lichess masters database, updated Sep 26, 2026
Description
The Horwitz Defense (1.d4 e6), also called the Franco-Indian Defence, is a flexible reply to 1.d4. It has little independent significance: Black keeps the choice between the French Defense, the Indian defences, the Dutch Defense and several others, and the game usually transposes to one of them.
Origins
The name Franco-Indian comes from the fact that the move may lead to the French or to one of the Indian defences. Author Eric Schiller proposed the name Horwitz Defence after the German master and writer Bernhard Horwitz (1807–1885), who played it against Daniel Harrwitz between 1849 and 1852. English grandmaster Simon Williams often uses 1.d4 e6 to reach a Dutch Defence while avoiding the Staunton Gambit (1.d4 f5 2.e4).
The idea
1...e6 keeps Black's options open and waits for White's second move. Against 2.c4 Black can choose almost any 1...e6 system; one of the few independent lines is 2...Bb4+, the Keres Defence.
Main lines
- 2.e4 transposes to the French Defense.
- 2.c4, when Black can choose:
- 2...d5, the Queen's Gambit Declined;
- 2...Nf6, heading for the Nimzo-Indian, Queen's Indian or Bogo-Indian defences;
- 2...f5, the Dutch Defense;
- 2...b6, the English Defense;
- 2...Bb4+, the Keres Defence (Kangaroo Defense in this database), where White usually plays 3.Bd2 to avoid a Nimzo-Indian;
- 2...c5, leading to a Benoni after 3.d5 or to an English Opening after 3.Nf3.
- 2.Nf3 offers a similar range of transpositions while avoiding 2...Bb4+.
- 2.g3 may also lead to the Catalan Opening.
- 2.Bf4 is usually played to reach a London System.
Strengths and weaknesses
Strengths
- Very flexible: Black can steer the game toward a favourite system.
- Avoids gambits such as the Staunton Gambit against the Dutch.
Weaknesses
- White keeps options too: after 2.e4 Black must be ready to play a French Defense.
- Black has to know the systems it transposes to.
Who should play it
The Horwitz suits Black players with a French or Dutch repertoire who want to keep White guessing, or who want to reach the Dutch without allowing the Staunton Gambit.
The numbers
On Lichess White wins about 51% at every level: 50.9% against 45.1% under 1400, 51.2% against 44.8% at 1400–1799, 51.0% against 43.9% at 1800–2199 and 50.0% against 42.6% from 2200 up. In about 41,700 master games White won 34.5%, Black 24.7%, and 40.8% were drawn.
Suggest an improvement or report a mistake
How to play against the Horwitz Defense
2. Nf3 scores best for White: 54.6%, with White winning 52.0% and Black 42.8% of 10.9M games. The most played, 2. c4, scores 53.9% in 25.5M games, and 2. e4 scores lowest: 51.4%. Stockfish's first choice is 2. e4.
Main answers: those played in at least 5% of these games. Score: White's wins plus half the draws, in rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 to 2500. How to play against other popular openings
Popularity by year
The Horwitz Defense has stayed between 2.4% and 2.7% of Lichess games a year since 2016 (2.4% in 2025).
Numbers by year
| Year | Share of games | Games |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2.7% | 957,797 |
| 2017 | 2.6% | 1,458,214 |
| 2018 | 2.6% | 2,038,777 |
| 2019 | 2.5% | 3,116,043 |
| 2020 | 2.4% | 7,072,490 |
| 2021 | 2.4% | 9,409,625 |
| 2022 | 2.4% | 9,111,580 |
| 2023 | 2.4% | 9,056,338 |
| 2024 | 2.4% | 8,568,760 |
| 2025 | 2.4% | 8,405,504 |
| 2026 (Jan–Apr) | 2.4% | 2,645,239 |
Share of rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 to 2500 (blitz, rapid and classical) that reach this position, by year; 2026: January to April. Which openings are rising and falling
Variations (4)
Transpositions
Sources
- History and theory: adapted from the Wikipedia article Franco-Indian Defence, version of 6 July 2025, under CC BY-SA 4.0.
- Results: Lichess opening explorer, figures collected from September to November 2026.
Cite this page
Caissa Codex. “Horwitz Defense (A40)”. Lichess data as of 5 Nov 2026. https://chesscodex.org/openings/horwitz-defense