Latvian Gambit
Also known as Greco Countergambit
The Latvian Gambit, also called the Greco Countergambit, is 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5: Black answers the attack on e5 by attacking White's e-pawn with the f-pawn. Read the guide
Play any move on the board to explore from there, or step through the line with ‹ › and the arrow keys.
Statistics from Lichess
3,701,883 games: White 48.2% / Draw 3.7% / Black 48.2%
| Next move | Games | White / Draw / BlackW / D / B |
|---|---|---|
| Latvian Gambit Accepted | 1,217,8831.2M | |
| 1,091,3971.1M | ||
| 489,954490K | ||
| Mlotkowski Variation | 367,896368K | |
| Mason Countergambit | 276,236276K | |
| Mayet Attack | 218,271218K | |
| 12,10612K | ||
| 9,0249,024 |
Rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 to 2500, from the Lichess opening explorer, updated Nov 6, 2026
Engine evaluation
+1.76 White is clearly better
Even so, Black scores 50.0% here in practice: wins plus half the draws in rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 to 2500.
Best play: 3. Nxe5 Qf6 4. d4 d6 5. Nc4 fxe4 6. Nc3 Qg6 7. f3 Be7
Stockfish 19, depth 30, after the line's last move. Scores are in pawns, from White's side.
By rating
The stronger the players, the better this line does for Black: Black scores 46% under 1400, 50% at 2200 and up and 24% in master games (wins plus half the draws).
| Players | Games | White / Draw / BlackW / D / B |
|---|---|---|
| Under 1400 | 1.6M | |
| 1400–1799 | 2.5M | |
| 1800–2199 | 2.1M | |
| 2200 and up | 188K | |
| Masters, over the board | 365 |
Master games
- Apicella, M. – Sokolov, I.
- Romanishin, O. M. – Van Riemsdijk, H. C.
- Hickl, J. – Sieglen, J.
- Ivanovic, B. – Hector, J.
- Lamoureux, C. – Kosten, A. C.
Rated blitz, rapid and classical Lichess games by rating band, and over-the-board games of players rated 2200+ from the Lichess masters database, updated Sep 26, 2026
Description
The Latvian Gambit, also called the Greco Countergambit, is 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5: Black answers the attack on e5 by attacking White's e-pawn with the f-pawn. It looks like a King's Gambit with colours reversed and a move down. It is aggressive but objectively dubious, and it often leads to wild, tricky positions. Its ECO code is C40.
Origins
It is one of the oldest chess openings. Giulio Cesare Polerio analysed it in the late 16th century, and the Italian player Gioachino Greco (1600–1634) contributed to its early theory, which is why some writers still call it the Greco Countergambit.
The name "Latvian Gambit" honours several Latvian players who analysed it, above all Kārlis Bētiņš. When the Austrian master Albert Becker published an article that Bētiņš found dismissive of the gambit, Bētiņš answered by publishing and analysing one of his own games with it, Ilyin-Zhenevsky vs. Bētiņš, 1921.
Main lines
- 3.Nxe5 is considered the main line. After the usual 3...Qf6, the traditional continuation has been 4.d4 d6 5.Nc4 fxe4, often followed by 6.Nc3 Qg6. The immediate 4.Nc4, the Leonhardt Variation, keeps the option of d2–d3 and has become more popular in recent years. After 4...fxe4 5.Nc3 Qf7 6.Ne3 c6 White can take the pawn with 7.Nxe4 or decline it with the more popular 7.d3.
- 3.Bc4 leads to perhaps the most notorious and heavily analysed line: 3...fxe4 4.Nxe5 Qg5 5.d4 Qxg2 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Bf7+ Kd8 8.Bxg6 Qxh1+ 9.Ke2. Nowadays Black often prefers 4...d5 instead of 4...Qg5.
- 3.exf5 e4 4.Ne5 Nf6 5.Be2 is recommended by John L. Watson and Eric Schiller.
- 3.Nc3 was first analysed by the American master Stasch Mlotkowski in the 1916 British Chess Magazine. Today Black's answer is considered to be 3...fxe4.
- 3.d4 fxe4 4.Nxe5 Nf6 5.Bg5 d6 leads, as usual, to sharp play. The quiet 3.d3 does not promise White any advantage.
Who plays it
The Latvian has a dubious reputation: FIDE Master Dennis Monokroussos called it "possibly the worst opening in chess". Paul van der Sterren wrote that playing it with success requires a sharp eye for tactics and total contempt for what theory says about it.
It has always been rare at the top level, but some correspondence players are devoted to it, and its surprise value is high because few opponents know it. Boris Spassky and Mikhail Chigorin played it, usually in casual games, and even Bobby Fischer and José Raúl Capablanca lost to it. Sweden's Jonny Hector is one of the few grandmasters to play it in serious competition. He has argued that it is not as bad as its reputation and that even with best play White's advantage is not large.
The numbers
On Lichess White and Black each win 48.2% of the 3.7 million games. Under 1400 White wins 52.4% against 44.3%, but between 1800 and 2199 Black is slightly ahead, 48.3% against 47.9%, and from 2200 up White wins 47.6% against 46.8%. Masters are a different story: in 365 games over the board White won 67.7% and Black only 15.1%.
Suggest an improvement or report a mistake
How to play against the Latvian Gambit
3. Nxe5 scores best for White: 52.3%, with White winning 50.5% and Black 45.9% of 1.1M games. The most played, 3. exf5, scores 48.4% in 1.2M games, and 3. d3 scores lowest: 48.2%. Stockfish's first choice is also 3. Nxe5.
Main answers: those played in at least 5% of these games. Score: White's wins plus half the draws, in rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 to 2500. How to play against other popular openings
Popularity by year
The Latvian Gambit has lost ground since 2016: 0.13% of Lichess games in 2025, down from 0.17%.
Numbers by year
| Year | Share of games | Games |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.17% | 59,424 |
| 2017 | 0.18% | 98,370 |
| 2018 | 0.16% | 128,038 |
| 2019 | 0.16% | 203,124 |
| 2020 | 0.16% | 466,365 |
| 2021 | 0.15% | 585,506 |
| 2022 | 0.14% | 510,604 |
| 2023 | 0.13% | 485,967 |
| 2024 | 0.13% | 478,244 |
| 2025 | 0.13% | 457,314 |
| 2026 (Jan–Apr) | 0.15% | 160,612 |
Share of rated Lichess games between players rated 1600 to 2500 (blitz, rapid and classical) that reach this position, by year; 2026: January to April. Which openings are rising and falling
Variations (12)
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted 3. exf5
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Foltys-Leonhardt Variation 3. Nxe5 Qf6 4. Nc4
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Main Line 3. Nxe5 Qf6 4. d4
- C40 Corkscrew Gambit 3. Nxe5 Nf6 4. Bc4 fxe4 5. Nf7 Qe7 6. Nxh8 d5
- C40 Diepstraten Countergambit 3. c4
- C40 Fraser Defense 3. Nxe5 Nc6
- C40 Greco Variation 3. Nxe5 Qe7
- C40 Lobster Gambit 3. g4
- C40 Mason Countergambit 3. d4
- C40 Mayet Attack 3. Bc4
- C40 Mlotkowski Variation 3. Nc3
- C40 Senechaud Gambit 3. b4
Transpositions
All 24 named lines that continue from here
No line matches.
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted 3 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Foltys-Leonhardt Variation 4 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Main Line 4 moves
- C40 Corkscrew Gambit 6 moves
- C40 Diepstraten Countergambit 3 moves
- C40 Fraser Defense 3 moves
- C40 Greco Variation 3 moves
- C40 Lobster Gambit 3 moves
- C40 Mason Countergambit 3 moves
- C40 Mayet Attack 3 moves
- C40 Mlotkowski Variation 3 moves
- C40 Senechaud Gambit 3 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Bilguer Variation 5 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Foltys Variation 5 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Leonhardt Variation 5 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit: Behting Variation 7 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit: Corkscrew Countergambit 4 moves
- C40 Morgado Defense 3 moves
- C40 Poisoned Pawn Variation 5 moves
- C40 Polerio-Svedenborg Variation 4 moves
- C40 Strautins Gambit 3 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Bronstein Attack 6 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Bronstein Gambit 7 moves
- C40 Latvian Gambit Accepted: Nimzowitsch Attack 6 moves
Sources
- History and theory: adapted from the Wikipedia article Latvian Gambit, version of 1 October 2026, under CC BY-SA 4.0.
- Results: Lichess opening explorer, figures collected from September to November 2026.
Cite this page
Caissa Codex. “Latvian Gambit (C40)”. Lichess data as of 6 Nov 2026. https://chesscodex.org/openings/latvian-gambit